Twilight Themed Facebook Scam Spreading Around Social Networks

Team Jacob or Team Edward?

If you’ve got an answer, then you’re a perfect target for a new “Twilight”-themed Facebook scam currently spreading around the massive, and massively exploitable, social network.

Detected by researchers from the security firm Trend Micro, this new scam promises free tickets to see “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.”

Sounds great, right? Who wouldn’t want free tickets to a wildly anticipated movie?

There are two catches to this otherwise great offer. The first, of course, is that “Breaking Dawn, Part 2″ isn’t scheduled to hit big screens until Nov. 12, 2012, well after the Nov. 18, 2011 release of “Part 1.”

If that doesn’t raise a red flag, and you find yourself driven uncontrollably — like, say a vampire — to score these free movie tickets and see how the passionate relationship between Bella, Edward and Jacob ends — well, you’re out of luck.

Like past movie ticket scams that have preyed on Harry Potter fans, following this scam’s directions will redirect victims to a malicious survey that, once filled out, requests their phone number.

Related story: Secrets of ‘Breaking Dawn’: What do we know?

 

“As past scams have demonstrated, giving one’s phone number during one of these scams is a very bad idea and could result [in] the user being subscribed to premium-rate services,” the tech blog Softpedia wrote.

If you come across this, or any other suspicious-looking Facebook offers, ignore them, and never download any attachments, as they often harbor malicious software. For a list of social networking alternatives, click here.

 

© 2011 SecurityNewsDaily. All rights reserved

 

 

rd?

If you’ve got an answer, then you’re a perfect target for a new “Twilight”-themed Facebook scam currently spreading around the massive, and massively exploitable, social network.

Detected by researchers from the security firm Trend Micro, this new scam promises free tickets to see “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.”

Sounds great, right? Who wouldn’t want free tickets to a wildly anticipated movie?

There are two catches to this otherwise great offer. The first, of course, is that “Breaking Dawn, Part 2″ isn’t scheduled to hit big screens until Nov. 12, 2012, well after the Nov. 18, 2011 release of “Part 1.”

If that doesn’t raise a red flag, and you find yourself driven uncontrollably — like, say a vampire — to score these free movie tickets and see how the passionate relationship between Bella, Edward and Jacob ends — well, you’re out of luck.

Like past movie ticket scams that have preyed on Harry Potter fans, following this scam’s directions will redirect victims to a malicious survey that, once filled out, requests their phone number.

Related story: Secrets of ‘Breaking Dawn’: What do we know?

 

“As past scams have demonstrated, giving one’s phone number during one of these scams is a very bad idea and could result [in] the user being subscribed to premium-rate services,” the tech blog Softpedia wrote.

If you come across this, or any other suspicious-looking Facebook offers, ignore them, and never download any attachments, as they often harbor malicious software. For a list of social networking alternatives, click here.

 

© 2011 SecurityNewsDaily. All rights reserved

 

 

 

Related Blogs

 

Related Blogs

 

Related Blogs


Related Blogs

    Facebook Games App Kabam Taking ‘The Godfather’ To Facebook With New Social Game

    Facebook Games App The GodFather

    Facebook App :A scene from The Godfather: Five Families

    “I’m gonna make him an offer he won’t refuse. Okay?”
    –Don Corleone

    Social gaming start-up Kabam is partnering with Paramount Digital Entertainment to create The Godfather: Five Families, a new multi-player Facebook social game based on the iconic Godfather film trilogy.

    The move could presage more moves by large studios to turn older classic entertainment content into newfangled social games. Other brands recently brought to Facebook include Ubisoft’s Smurfs game and Electronic Art’s Sims Social.

    It’s a first for Kabam in terms of licensing intellectual property to build a game. It’s also a way for Viacom’ Paramount to monetize its existing titles. The Godfather movies are still quite popular–its Facebook page has almost 5 million fans–but the movie may not be as well-known with the younger generation. However, gamers clearly like mobster games. Witness Zynga’s Mafia Wars, Freeweb’s Mob Wars, the mobile game iMob Online, and so on. Kabam’s new game is going after both Kabam’s hard core social gaming audience but also a broader mainstream audience interested in the Godfather movies.

    Kabam is backed by about $125 million from investors including Google Ventures, SK Telecom Ventures, Canaan Partners, Redpoint Ventures and Intel Capital.

     

    Facebook Games App The GodFatherThis Godfather game is set in New York City in the early 1930s, ten years before the time of the first godfather in the first movie. The goal of the game is to take over territory in the city by attacking others in the game. To do this players gather resources such as food, steel and cement. Then they train an army made up of units that level up from categoriss such as “thug” up to “professional.”

    The Godfather game incorporates Kabam’s style of play, which is competitive and combat-oriented games. They are also social so people can play with friends or meet new players in the game. In the game, people can choose from one of the five mafia families to join. Each family has special characteristics and skills in the game and will battle for territory in the city. Within the family, players also join an alliance or “crew.” The smaller groups, which are a new feature for Kabam, enable more communication and interaction between players. Players strategize and organize attacks on other groups through the game as they can in other Kabam games such as Edgeworld. “One thing we saw as a huge indicator of why people like to play games is that they feel like they’re part of a tight-knit community,” says Larry Koh, general manager of the game at Kabam.Facebook Games

    Facebook Marketing

    Facebook Friends


    Related Blogs

      Facebook Etiquette : Should Teachers & Students Be Allowed To Interact On Facebook?

       

      Facebook

      At this point, just about everyone is on Facebook. And if you’re anything like us, you’re probably friends with just about all of them. From that guy who you barely knew back in high school to your pesky neighbor to your grandmother, there’s a pretty good chance that if you’ve got a Facebook account, you’re friends with them.

      So it should come as no surprise to hear that there are plenty of students out there—particularly in high school and college—who are friends with their teachers on Facebook. In most instances, it’s a situation where a student and teacher become Facebook friends long after their student/teacher relationship is over. Believe it or not, teachers can actually be pretty decent people when they’re not chasing your around badgering you for your homework or telling you to keep it down in the back of the classroom.

      However, there’s an interesting debate going on in Missouri right now stemming from Senate Bill 54, which has come to be known as the “Facebook Law. Missouri Senator Jane Cunningham recently introduced a bill that, if passed, would make it illegal for teachers and students to have any contact on Facebook or other social media sites. The bill is a response to several instances in which teacher/student relationships on Facebook have resulted in sexual harassment. Senator Cunningham hopes that by passing this law, state government will be able to eliminate these types of interactions and keep students safe from teachers who have ill intentions when they sign onto their Facebook accounts and friend students. It’s a law that could change the way that all states treat the teacher/student relationship when it comes to social media.

      Is it a good idea? Eh, that’s where the debate comes into play. On the surface, the Facebook Law makes a whole lot of sense. As Facebook has evolved, most students have seen absolutely no issue with friending a teacher on Facebook. Teachers also seem more than willing to use the social media site to keep in touch with students and to expand on their relationships with students. But, of course, there are some teachers—and some students, for that matter—who abuse this ability to keep in contact. As a result, there have been a number of stories involving teachers and students and sexual harassment. So, naturally, the easiest way to prevent these types of interactions from happening would be to ban them altogether.

      The Missouri Student Teacher Association sees things a different way, though. They’ve argued that they want to see slight changes to the bill and that they don’t want the Facebook Law to have a negative effect on the student learning experience. They believe that if teachers and students want to use Facebook to interact about school-related matters, they should be able to do so. The Missouri National Education Association has also chimed in, saying that they want to make some changes to the Facebook Law that allows schools and not the Missouri state government to police the issue of teachers and students interacting on Facebook.

      It’s definitely a slippery slope. While the Facebook Law has the best of intentions, it’s probably not the best idea to issue a complete ban on teachers and students friending one another on Facebook. Because while the law would limit the sexual harassment that’s going on due to teachers and students interacting on Facebook, it would also limit the positive effects that it has on the student learning experience. In other words, Missouri lawmakers shouldn’t let a few bad apples spoil the bunch.

      Instead, they should allow individual school districts to police the behavior of their teachers on Facebook. If they feel that teachers interacting with students on Facebook could possibly be detrimental to the students, they should be able to force them to stop doing it. However, if they can put in specific guidelines that permit some interaction between teachers and students, assuming the interaction ties directly to school-related matters, they should allow it.

      But, above all, the Facebook Law should get people talking about how teachers and students interact. The first instinct of most people is probably going to be to ban it altogether. But as we move forward and Facebook and other forms of social media become more and more useful when it comes to the classroom, school districts need to think long and hard about this issue. Because with just about everyone on Facebook now, it’s only natural that more and more teachers and students will friend each other. And we need to make sure that they know their boundaries before they do it.

      Related Posts with Thumbnails

      Popularity: 1%

       

      Bookmark to:












      Related Blogs

        Facebook Revamps Privacy, Pictures And Purchases On Its Way To IPO

        Facebook Market Strategy,Facebook Marketplace

        Facebook

        jumps into and out of the news like a Jack-in-the-box who’s had too much caffeine, but this last week has seen an unusual amount of officially announced Facebook tweaks, as well as a bit of saber rattling regarding its future plans. Something is up in Zuckerberg’s blue-hued social network.

        Privacy

        The biggest change Facebook made this week was a long-awaited overhaul to its deplorably (and legally criticized) complex privacy settings: From now on, users have much more granular control over what they share with whom when they update their statuses, because you can choose how private to make each and every update.

        This is being hailed as a great move, because it means users no longer have to navigate through Facebook‘s obscure privacy settings screens–requiring a flurry of clicks to adjust how open or closed your Facebook profile is. The company has even made it easy, within a click of the mouse or two, to preview what your profile looks like to different people.

        Historically, however, Facebook has been cavalier and aggressive in pushing to redefine privacy online–with its social network in the fore. By enabling a per-update privacy maneuver, Facebook is most definitely tempting users to post much more content to the entire network rather than to their trusted friends only. Without having to adjust their “global” security settings all the time, more carefree users could start sharing their photos with everyone.

        At some point, perhaps Facebook will pull a signature switcheroo, and make its new system “default:all” so users have to select privacy for every status update.

        Meanwhile, Google+ is hailed for having numerous features Facebook “should have” but doesn’t, including better privacy management. Facebook is not under serious threat from Google+ now, but this kind of PR is bad for it. Just as Google+ is earning generally positive press. And Facebook keeps seeing newsworthiness, via real-time public status updates not coming through its system: Google+ is being used to drive Google’s future real-time search capabilities; and Twitter demonstrated its news distributing powers during the East Coast earthquake.

        Meanwhile, Twitter’s about to get a boost through deep integration in Apple’s iOS 5 upgrade, which may grab some social network attention away from Facebook because the iPhone is the world’s most popular single brand of smartphone. By boosting its privacy, and enabling a potentially more public sharing mode, Facebook is trying to keep its customers and future sweet.

        There’s also the matter of the FCC. Ahead of its hotly anticipated IPO, Facebook probably wants to look like it’s acting in the best interests of its consumers–and boosting the granularity of privacy controls is one easy way to do this.

        Imagery

        Facebook tried to buy Instagram, but was rebuffed. So it’s trying an “if you can’t join ‘em, beat ‘em” trick and is offering effects filters for photos shared through it rather than a separate app like Hipstamatic or Instagram.

        What’s going on here is that there’s a booming social sharing meme going on that’s outside of Facebook’s controls. It likes to think of itself as a repository and sharing vehicle for photos and videos–and it is–but Instagram and other apps are innovating and having their own social activities organized around images, and sometimes mediated through Twitter. If Facebook can grab some of this limelight, then it may tempt some smartphone users to use Facebook’s system rather than a rival’s…enabling Facebook to achieve more eyes-on-adverts time.

        Acquisitions

        Facebook’s director of corporate development Vaughan Smith gave an interview this week in which he stated that the company was in the mood to make about 20 acquisitions this year–seven more than its current figure, which includes names like Push Pop Press. That’s double the number for 2010, and 20 times more than 2009′s figure. The most recent feature spin-off from an acquisition is Facebook’s own group messaging service on iPhones and Androids, which comes from the tech of a firm called Beluga that it bought in February and is a rival to instant messaging features that others have planned, such as Apple’s iMessage.

        What Facebook is doing here is demonstrating that it has a spirit for expansion of its business, even as it may be approaching some form of saturation in terms of user numbers. Using smart thinking to acquire target firms demonstrates business savviness, a drive for future growth, and the ability to use (perhaps sparse) cash reserves wisely. These are the sorts of things that investors at IPO will be looking for.

        China

        One big market for Facebook, which really could dramatically alter its user numbers, is China. For now Facebook simply cannot penetrate this market, as its open discussion frameworks would permit Chinese citizens to have the kinds of discussions the government would prefer that they didn’t (they’re even squeezing locally approved Twitter clones on this matter). Nevertheless, it’s known that Facebook is in negotiations to try to launch a China product.

        These plans were dealt a nasty blow this week when Microsoft inked a deal between its MSN and RenRen, which is China’s rough equivalent of Facebook. It may influence Facebook’s future plans to get millions more users logged into its massive database and bolted into its revenue generating streams.

        Developer Conference

        Facebook also revealed details for its upcoming F8 Developer’s conference. It’s happening September 22nd, and Facebook is promsing “exciting product announcements that enable a new class of social apps.” Since 2010′s conference saw the arrival of its Open Graph API and the “like” button, this could be very big news.

        So I Said Hey, What’s Going On?

        Picking through the threads here, it’s possible to draw one conclusion: Facebook is growing up. As it approaches IPO it’ll have to demonstrate a little more level-headedness, a little bit more responsible corporate governance, a growth plan, a less legally dubious attitude to personal privacy erosion and so on. This doesn’t jibe with Mark Zuckerberg’s shy, but doggedly determined management style, nor his dismissive attitude toward privacy doomsayers.

        Facebook’s current investors, already making a profit from secondary market trading, may be behind this, grooming the entire business so that it can slip through a smooth and lucrative IPO and scale to new, geographic markets.

        [Image: Flickr user Josh McConnell]

        Chat about this news with Kit Eaton on Twitter and Fast Company too.

        Related Blogs

          Dangers of Facebook for teens

           FacebookI received an intriguing e-mail Monday morning from the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University,about Facebook and teenagers.

          The center does an annual survey on teen attitudes toward drinking and drug use.

          This year’s report found something new and alarming: Teens who regularly use Facebook and Myspace are much more likely than social network avoiders to drink, smoke and use marijuana.

          One possible reason for that, the report concluded, is that teens who use social media are likely to see images of their peers drinking or using drugs.

          A large body of research has shown the influence of peer pressure on teen substance abuse, and this could well be the new frontier.

          There are skeptics, though, and they say that the research doesn’t adequately control for other influences.

          Maybe a kid has a parent who drinks heavily or uses drugs, or lives in a neighborhood where such things are commonplace.

          Those things, the critics say, likely have much more power than social media over a child’s decision to use drugs or alcohol.

          Facebook and Parental Control

          The research will undoubtedly go on. And so will the worries of parents.

          “It’s very frightening,” Jonna McIntyre, of Palatine, told my colleague Robert McCoppin.

          She has a 14-year-old daughter on Facebook, and just last week the girl said that some of her classmates smoke marijuana.

          “I put parental controls on (the Internet) but they know how to get around it. I hope being a good parent has rubbed off on her so she won’t do those kinds of things.”

          – John Keilman

          Join Trib Nation on Facebook for more of the how and why of Tribune journalism.

          Related Blogs

            Facebook Vs LinkedIn In Business

            Facebook And Linkedin :D ifference?

            Author: Joan Curtis

            What is the value of LinkedIn over Facebook in business? Is there a difference? When do you use one or the other or both? I’ve discovered that some businesses prefer LinkedIn; some prefer Facebook and some use neither. In this article we’ll take a look at the two platforms to help you distinguish which is best for you.

            The ultimate decision about which social network to use lies with your company culture, goals and customer. Nonetheless, it’s important to recognize that you cannot choose “none of the above,” if you want to survive the new digital economy. Therefore, the question is which do we choose and how do we begin?

            This post will help you begin to distinguish between the value of LinkedIn for business and the value of Facebook for business. In a previous article, I looked at Facebook vs. Twitter.

            It helps to understand the evolution of these two platforms to get an idea of what works best for each. Facebook began as a social networking tool for college students. Launched in 2004 in response to MySpace which linked young people together throughout their high school years, Facebook targeted the student entering a college campus. In the early days it was a highly social network, similar to MySpace.

            LinkedIn began, not as a social network, but as a business network. In contrast to Facebook, LinkedIn disallowed opportunities to post photo albums or to converse freely with the contacts. In the early days, the founders of LinkedIn saw an opportunity to create a social media site that was a little less “social” and a little more “professional.”

            Even though LinkedIn has expanded with applications to allow for many of the things we can do on Facebook and Twitter, it maintains its identity as a professional networking community. The restrictions for connection with people on LinkedIn are tighter than either Facebook or Twitter. Those restrictions have been loosened in recent years, but you still must say how you know a person before you can connect.

            In the early days LinkedIn began as a job search resource whereas Facebook began as a social site for college students. Headhunters as well as human resource professionals used LinkedIn to identify potential candidates. LinkedIn still serves this purpose, but it has grown to be a lot more than a hotbed for people looking for jobs. A strong professional network of trusted connections gives you a career advantage. Furthermore, the ability to quickly gain access to information and resources in this global economy will give you a significant competitive edge. If you see LinkedIn as merely a place for job hunting, you’ve missed a lot!

            Knowing how the two platforms began helps you understand the strengths of each and how you might best capitalize on those strengths.

            Value of Facebook to Business:

            • Primarily a social site. On Facebook you can share as much or as little personal information as you’d like. You can post photos of yourself and your family or of your company and employees. Facebook gives you an opportunity to create a personal as well as professional profile of who you are. People learn more about you as a person. In sales we talk about the know, like and trust factor before a sale is made. Businesses that focus on other businesses (B2B) as clients understand this factor. Facebook gives you a great opportunity to let down some barriers and help your business customer learn more about you. LinkedIn does not provide as much freedom for knowing the person beyond a “resume” like profile as Facebook does.
            • Versatility. Facebook enables you to set up a personal profile, a professional profile, a business page or a fan page. You have all kinds of choices for putting yourself and your business in front of your customers. People like to feel part of a business. You can enable that by setting up a fan page for your business or for a unique product that you offer. LinkedIn only offers one type of profile.
            • Facebook ads. For business Facebook gives you the opportunity to purchase a pay-for-click ad to target a unique niche. These ads are extremely cost effective because you only pay when someone clicks, and you can restrict how much you’ll pay each given month.

            Value of LinkedIn to Business

            • Search Options. On LinkedIn if you have a significant number of followers, you can gain access to people in certain jobs, industries and/or groups that you would otherwise never have. Unlike Facebook which only allows you to search friends. LinkedIn lets you search for companies, jobs and answers to questions, as well as for people. For salespeople the ability to search companies and locate additional network connections within those companies gives you a competitive advantage over others not using LinkedIn to the fullest.
            • Gain Expert Status or Credibility in your field. When LinkedIn began, the Question/Answer section of the site was a powerful place for you to showcase your knowledge. You could either post a question to the entire LinkedIn population or to segments of the network. You could answer questions other people posted. Many members answered questions and became experts in that area. Updated and expanded functions on LinkedIn enabled members to ask and answer questions within specific groups in which they are members. By becoming an active giver of information, you create credibility and trust with a wide range of people. Businesses who use this widely create visibility and credibility for their business. This is one of the most powerful uses of LinkedIn.
            • Recommendation function. LinkedIn gives you a great opportunity to showcase the value of your features without advertising. Businesses who use the recommendation section wisely do just this. LinkedIn requires three recommendations to complete your profile. Many businesses place many more than three. We caution, however, to make sure your recommendations give an accurate picture of the value of your services. Think of them as LinkedIn’s way to advertise.
            • Visibility of Blog posts. Using one of the blog posting applications included with LinkedIn, you can publish your blog posts directly to your LinkedIn profile and to any and all of your groups. This feature enables you to give your blog much broader visibility across the LinkedIn network. Instead of merely posting your blog to your profile or on the status update as is the case with Facebook, you can post it to an unlimited number of groups within your profile and you can niche your blog posts. In my case, instead of posting to just 350 friends on Facebook, my blog post could go to 30,000+ people in my LinkedIn group network. Often, I don’t send the post to all my groups, just those groups where I think there’s an interest.

            There are many more value differences between LinkedIn, Facebook and the other social networks. Ultimately, you must look at each platform and decide how you can create a social media strategy for your business.

            Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/advertising-articles/facebook-vs-linkedin-in-business-1992944.html

            About the Author

            Joan C. Curtis, EdD will release her third book in 2010. The New Handshake: Sales Meets Social Media (http://www.thenewhandshake.com) published by Praeger Press tells you everything you want to know about the social media and sales. Written with Barb Giamanco, who worked as director of sales for Microsoft, this book is a must read for everyone confused by the social media and wanting answers. Check out Joan and Barb’s blog, http://www.thenewhandshake.com

            What is your Social Media IQ? Take this free assessment http://www.totalcommunicationscoach.com/how-is-your-social-media

             

             

            Facebook Vs Linkedin

             

            Related Blogs

              Facebook Seeks Acquisitions to Fend Off Google Competition: Tech

              Facebook

               

              August 23, 2011, 6:02 AM EDT

              By Brian Womack

              (Embargoed for use at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on Aug. 24.)

              er Aug. 23 (Bloomberg) – Facebook Inc., the world’s largest social network, is planning acquisitions that will improve site design, keep its service reliable and advance mobile features to stave off competition from Google Inc. and Twitter Inc.

              The company aims to make about 20 purchases in 2011, up from 10 last year and one in 2009, Vaughan Smith, Facebook’s director of corporate development, said in an interview.

              Facebook is betting that a focus on design will entice people to spend more time on the site, while adding mobile services can cater to the growing number of members using handheld devices. As it grapples with competition from Google and Twitter, Facebook also must bolster its system so the site runs smoothly amid rapid growth. The company has made 13 acquisitions so far this year, including adding a mobile group- messaging service it rolled out to users this month.

              “Two years ago we didn’t have a track record in acquisitions,” Smith said. “While we expected them to work well, it was still a crapshoot how they’d turn out. We’ve built a culture that supports entrepreneurs, and it’s working incredibly well.”

              Facebook makes money from advertising and by taking a commission when software developers sell virtual goods on the site. As a closely held company, Facebook doesn’t disclose financials. A person with knowledge of the matter said in May that the company is likely to generate more than $2 billion in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization this year.

              In addition, Facebook has raised more than $2 billion from investors, including $1.5 billion from an investment led by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., announced in January.

              Google’s Cash

              By contrast, Google has $39.1 billion in cash. Google, the biggest Internet search engine, unveiled a new social-networking service, called Google+, in June. It already had attracted 29 million people by the end of July, according to ComScore Inc.

              Facebook, based in Palo Alto, California, has made mostly small acquisitions, with target companies sometimes having one or two employees. The company has a market value of $72.5 billion, according to SharesPost Inc., an exchange for private shares. That’s more than the valuations of publicly traded Internet companies such as EBay Inc. and Yahoo! Inc.

              The company can use cash and stock for acquisitions, according to Lou Kerner, an analyst at Wedbush Securities Inc. in New York. Facebook also can sell shares in the secondary markets for additional cash.

              No Hindrances?

              “I don’t think a lack of cash, even on their balance sheet, is a significant deterrent for the acquisitions that they’re looking at,” said Kerner, who declined to estimate how much cash the company has for purchases.

              Many of Facebook’s deals have been targeted at adding talent as the company vies with larger rivals for skilled technology workers. Google has announced plans to hire about 6,000 people this year globally.

              “Facebook is just trying to get the smartest people possible in any way it can,” said Debra Aho Williamson, an EMarketer Inc. analyst. “The idea of bringing in new talent, smart talent, people who have created interesting products that Facebook can capitalize on, is going to be important to them.”

              Facebook has been sharpening its focus on mobile, which is how more than a third of users access the site. In February, the company acquired Beluga, a startup that helped users send messages to groups of people through their mobile phones. Facebook earlier this month introduced its own application — based on Beluga’s technology — that handles messaging on Apple Inc.’s iPhone and phones based on Google’s Android software.

              ‘Top Priority’

              “The future of all computing is mobile,” Wedbush’s Kerner said. “Mobile, I think, is the top priority at the company.”

              Snaptu, a mobile startup Facebook acquired earlier this year, was bought for about $60 million, according to a person familiar with the matter. Smith said he is open to larger acquisitions, but declined to be more specific.

              On top of its mobile-computing push, the company has added services that let users manage their friends by groups or ask others questions on the site. As new features pile up, Facebook needs to manage its user-interface design, said Josh Bernoff, an analyst with Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

              “The challenge is that Facebook does a lot more things than it used to,” Bernoff said. “To get that all to be easily navigable is not simple.”

              Sofa, Push Pop

              Purchases in design this year have included Sofa, a software and user-interface company, and Push Pop Press, which offered publishing software for touch-enabled devices.

              The average U.S. Facebook user spends more than seven hours a month on the service, according to ComScore. With the jump in users — to more than 750 million from 500 million in July 2010 — as well as exponential growth in applications and products, the company is working to manage rising complexity in its vast computer systems. To help, the company opened a new data center in Prineville, Oregon, earlier this year.

              Still, Facebook has yet to make an acquisition in computing, and may seek to buy companies with technology and workers that will help it strengthen its system.

              “They have to over-plan for massive growth,” said Jeremiah Owyang, an analyst at Altimeter Group in San Mateo, California.

              –Editors: Jillian Ward, Nick Turner

              -0- Aug/23/2011 10:01 GMT

              To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Womack in San Francisco at bwomack1@bloomberg.net

              To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net.

              Related Blogs

                Check out Direct Sellers: Make the Most of LinkedIn Updates and Upgrades

                Facebook, Linkedin

                I want you to take a look at: Direct Sellers: Make the Most of LinkedIn Updates and Upgrades 

                Though there are many popular social networking sites out there, LinkedIn continues to be the leading social media platform for making social and business connections. Its a great way for professionals and business owners to connect, engage, and interact with each other, and information shared within the site is usually very valuable and informative, unlike other social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, where posts tend to be more on the personal side.

                Just recently, both Facebook and Google+ have rolled out some new features, and it seems LinkedIn isnt planning on being left behind, updating and upgrading as well. It recently acquired IndexTank, which provides real-time hosted search technology, and plans to improve the internal search within LinkedIn in the months to come. mini storage .

                Facebook, Linkedin


                Related Blogs

                  Facebook tweaks site to clarify who can see what

                  Facebook

                  Facebookis making a series of design changes to the site to make it clearer to users who can see the content that they post, an issue Google has been criticising about since it launched its own social network, Google+, in June.”You have told us that ‘who can see this?’ could be clearer across , so we have made changes to make this more visual and straightforward,” said in a facebook.com/blog.php?post=10150251867797131″>blog poston Tuesday. Facebook The main change is that will now display the intended audience for a photo, a text post, a tag or any other piece of content right next to it, or “inline” as stated in the blog post. Until now, those controls have been on a separate Settings section of the profile.”Your profile should feel like your home on the web — you should never feel like stuff appears there that you don’t want, and you should never wonder who sees what’s there,” the post reads.Now, every piece of content on a user’s profile will have a drop-down menu that lists its current access level, and other available options for changing it. These include sharing something only with people on one’s “friends” list, with “friends of friends,” with “everyone” on or off , or with a “custom” hand-picked list of people. The “everyone” option is changing its name to “public” because has determined the word “public” is more descriptive of that broad level of access.These “inline” access options will also be added to the content-posting box so that they are more easily accessible to people when they’re posting new photos, videos or written messages.”This dropdown menu will be expanding over time to include smaller groups of people you may want to share with, like co-workers, Friend Lists you’ve created, and Groups you’re a member of. These will make it easy to quickly select exactly the audience you want for any post,” ‘s blog post said.Since launching Google+, Google has been claiming that its site offers a simpler, more effective way to share content than . Google has said that ‘s privacy and content-sharing controls are too complex and inconvenient, leading users to often share inadvertently with a larger audience than intended.While the jury is still out on whether Google+’s Circles feature indeed offers an improvement over ‘s functionality, ‘s move today clearly seems motivated to address any competitive advantage Google may be trying to get with Circles.Another change is introducing is allowing users to modify the audience of a post after it’s published, which they couldn’t do before, the company said.is also introducing a review period for photos and posts in which users are tagged, giving the tagged users a chance to review the photo or post before it’s displayed on their profile, in case they want to un-tag themselves.A feature has had for years, which lets users see how their profile looks to another user, is gaining a more prominent placement in the profile page to make it more easily accessible and promote its usage.Along with the privacy-awareness changes, is also expanding users’ ability to tag others and label posts with geographical locations.Previously, users could only tag people on their “friends” list, but now it will be possible to tag anyone. Painting Denver . tent rental . With locations, it was only possible to “check in” with the Places feature on a smartphone, but now people will be able to add location tags from any device, and apply them not only to places but also to status updates, photos or other posts.

                  Facebook


                  Related Blogs

                    Facebook introduces a slew of privacy options

                    Facebook

                    Facebook’s Chris Cox, detailing the features on the company’s official blog, writes, “The main change is moving most of your controls from a settings page to being inline, right next to the posts, photos and tags they affect.” Even as Facebook executives unveiled these features early this morning during a live webcast, users like Dushyant Verghese were quick to express their opinion on the official Facebook blog. “I am glad a photo tag approval system has been included. Now, I can un-tag myself from those group photos that my friends keep putting up as part of a calendar app or a friendship day cartoon,” Verghese wrote.

                    The 33 million Indians who throng Facebook would be part of the worldwide community that would be able to add location information to any of their posts (or updates), even after they make it, instead of having to ‘check in’, using a mobile device. Earlier, Facebook users could only ‘check in’ to locations (socially share the places they visit) using the Places feature on a smartphone. However, Cox says, “Lots of people use Facebook to talk about where they are, have been, or want to go. Now, you can add your location from anywhere, regardless of what device you are using, or whether it is a status update, a photo or a wall post. Of course, you can always choose not to add a location at all.”

                    The privacy changes are being seen as a direct response to social networking rival Google+, which, while still in its testing stage, appears to have got the balance right. Google+ user Amith K, a Bangalore university student, says, “Earlier, in order to change your privacy settings, you had to go through the actual settings tab. Now, like Google+’s ‘circles’ feature, Facebook users can control each individual piece of content with a drop-down menu.” From the moment users join Google+, they can categorise friends and contacts into different groups called circles. And, when data is shared on Google+, the user is allowed to decide who he would share the information with—whether his family, friends, colleagues or everyone on the site.

                    Google+ has seen its user base flattening out at about 10 million users after a meteoric start in June. As users struggle to figure it, Facebook is using this opportunity to reinvigorate its own user base and cement its market lead, say social media analysts. Facebook, which has scooped up 13 companies this year, has targeted properties that dress up its site’s design and enhance mobile features, as it competes with Google and Twitter.

                    On the new privacy features being a mirror image of Google+’s ones, Shomir Dutt, user operations analyst at Facebook, says, “I’m guessing these changes would have been in the pipeline for a long time. They’re not something you can come up with in a month. No doubt, Google+ has had them from the beginning. Facebook just took some time.”

                    Facebook


                    Related Blogs